I don't want to start anything too controversial, but this has been big in the news recently and I think many were shocked to see the news and verdict of a serial killer nurse. I certainly was and didn't know anything about it until the verdict. After reading around it a bit, it's a confusing case and I can see why so many people had doubts and expected her to be acquitted - lack of evidence apart from anything else.
There are three organisations now trying to help with an appeal, saying the scientific evidence used to find her guilty was incorrect and it was an unfair trial. So I've been reading around a bit and can't come to any conclusions one way or the other. I suppose we'll have to wait to see what an appeal brings up.
There are three organisations now trying to help with an appeal, saying the scientific evidence used to find her guilty was incorrect and it was an unfair trial. So I've been reading around a bit and can't come to any conclusions one way or the other. I suppose we'll have to wait to see what an appeal brings up.